back to articles

Vision For Life

A Vision for Tomorrow

By Guy Riekeman, D.C., President, Life University

Today I received word of Life’s reaffirmation of accreditation with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS). A minor point for the average practicing DC, but for Life University it was a monumental decision. Monumental first in that SACS accreditation is critical to the University receiving Title IV student loan funds, and assuring the outside world of the quality of our education—this translates to survival and long-term stability. Second, it is the culmination of nine months of critical events, each of which had to fall into place perfectly to insure overall success (see article on page 20). And finally, it positions us at the starting line for building the new Life University. Already enrollment is up, new research is in the planning stages, and an innovative curriculum design is being explored. In the months and years ahead you will see Life University become a leader in world-class health care, education and research.

When I joined Life on March 5, 2004, most people felt working toward a future was a futile effort. Based on its recent history the PROBABILITIES of the university recovering were next to zero. But drawing from Einstein’s world, which interjects the idea of a universe of POSSIBILITIES that defy linear probabilities; the future does not have to be a predictable extension of the past, as there is potential for unique, unexpected and often unexplained phenomena, to occur to create a future not predicated on the past. We have experienced these phenomena during the past year.

In consideration of this most exciting day for Life and chiropractic I want to share Bill O’Brien’s, Ph.D., one of our new Board members, reflections of Einstein’s theory of possibilities. His words capture perfectly the essence of this theory as it applies to the future of Life and the profession.

A “Life” of Possibilities
“I am quite convinced that someone will come up with a theory whose objects, connected by laws, are not probabilities.” Albert Einstein, 1956

Let’s understand the context for Einstein’s comment. By the mid 20th century, two things had happened. First, science had managed to position itself as the primary source for anything the modern world needed to validate; mathematical, metaphysical or otherwise. Secondly, the scientific community had essentially institutionalized itself in the form of a standardized research methodology based on probabilities science: nice, idealized symmetrical distributions around central tendencies such as means or averages. The curves told us where any phenomenon stood in relation to this central tendency.

Accordingly, the mission of the 20th century was to move toward reducing our deviation to look more and more like the middle of the curve. By the 1950s, American culture personified this effect. While it produced a seemingly infinite array of products and services, it simultaneously generated apparently finite images of people who look and act and think alike. Ideas that were ‘outside the box’ were mostly ignored by “standard bearers.” These leaders believed that their probabilities methodology in the context of a nuclear age had validated their privileged access to the ultimate power of the universe.

What did Einstein and BJ Palmer have in common? Although they understood (more accurately than others) the contributions of probabilities inquiry, they both never fell for it; their egos were never seduced by it, and they certainly refused to be conditioned by it. Instead, they sought the truth by relating to universal principles. They both understood that science was an inherently spiritual quest. They dedicated their lives to becoming nature’s biographers. They understood that the more we could probe the unknown, the closer we could get to understanding God. Einstein discovered these principles in outer space and applied them to quantum physics. BJ discovered them in inner space and applied them to the human experience.

So it is particularly ironic that what the chiropractic profession is debating these days involves an assumption that BJ dismissed a half-century ago. The tension within chiropractic rests squarely in our probabilities conditioning. Numerous chiropractic and health care constituencies are jockeying for the high ground to determine who gets to describe, predict and control the future behavior of chiropractors. I don’t believe Einstein or BJ would have prescribed such a remedy. Also, I have a sneaking suspicion that most chiropractors have neither the desire nor the disposition to condition their future thought processes pursuant to these results. It has never happened in the past and it isn’t going to happen in the future.

This is probably why mobilizing chiropractors is a bit like herding cats. And like cats, most chiropractors are convinced that the profession has nine lives and will always land on its feet. This may help explain why so many doctors have relegated themselves to the sidelines regarding the political science of their profession. The problem of course, is that all-important movements are dependent upon the existence of a robust constituency. Conversely, constituencies are dependent upon their organization’s leaders to create viable marketplace conditions while maintaining the integrity of the movement’s original intent.

Life University, with its profound sense of purpose and its combination of new and veteran leaders who are dedicated to continuous improvement, is well positioned to deliver on that intent. We can mobilize faculty, students and alumni by employing the ‘possibilities’ process; relating-empowering-freeing. It begins with relating. We relate by acknowledging that most of our faculty, students and alumni are primarily on a spiritual quest. They want to experience the intimacy of a university willing to ask, unconditionally, “How can we help you to actualize your life’s purpose and express it each day?” Imagine that; a university that relates universally!

It continues by empowering its students with the academic capability and the existential disposition to apply those ‘Life’ principles in whatever occupation they choose to enter and ultimately influence. It continues further by empowering its future chiropractors with a unifying philosophy, an underlying art, the rigor of scientific inquiry and the real life application of universal principles so that they can produce outstanding results in their actual practice.
Finally, once empowered, it is about freeing our faculty and students. Yes, freeing them to find their own changeable destinies; unconstrained by man’s law of probabilities and like Einstein himself, committed to discovering God’s law of possibilities.

Provide your feedback on this article.

© Copyright 2005 Today's Chiropractic

return to top